|
|
|
|
|
|
by mrpotato
1372 days ago
|
|
|
Use both! I think one of the main differences is that scoop will install for the local user. Which means you don't have to install stuff from an admin console (I think you can do that with choco but its not the default). I also just checked to see what apps I've used in scoop vs choco and the only one that choco doesn't have (that scoop does) is wsl-ssh-agent. scoop had all the apps I install through choco. I'm sure theres more differences that go a little deeper, but as a simple end user, those are the only things I've noticed |
|
|