|
|
|
|
|
by s1artibartfast
1369 days ago
|
|
I just think it is a funny juxtaposition when workers shout about the "Value or revenue they created" on one hand and then claim and then claim individual value creation doesn't matter on the other hand. The whole question of where the value comes from and "who deserves it" is central to the argument, and there are a lot of positions with different axioms.
I hadn't heard that it is deserved simply for being a warm body in a chair independent of any productivity, so that's a new one. The same could be said of shareholders: Why are employees so focused on direct attribution? As a shareholder you are part of the machine, ect. If you aren't creating any value, its not your problem the machine is dysfunctional... |
|
A worker was hired by a system, that system decided they needed that worker and as a contract promised said worker a salary. Why is the fault of the worker that the work they perform doesn't add value?
I really can't comprehend why a systemic failure such as hiring people that you think don't add value is supposedly an individual's fault. If the system failed, why is that you point to the worker and not to the system that failed and hired said zero/negative value worker?
> As a shareholder you are part of the machine
That's a new one. What part exactly does a shareholder perform in this machine, given we are discussing a public company? No bullshit about "pricing" and other financial shenanigans, please.