| Just a heads up, your resume links your GitHub, which reveals your name. I work for a smaller company so my approach to resume review might differ from others, but a couple of things stand out: * As an interviewer, I'm not especially interested in the fact that you took "Modern Physics" or organic chemistry. These might be relevant to a particular role, but in the context of a generic resume they come across as filler. * Your projects and work experience are grouped by language, rather than chronology or complexity. I'd prefer either of those, since they tell me more about what I should ask you about. By the same token: it's good to list your own "level of proficiency" with each language, so that I can confirm that against my expectations. I would restructure and reorder your resume entirely: your past experience is a little thin, so start with a personal statement (who you are, what you're interested in doing), summarize your projects and work experience, and list your awards and comments at the end. Edit: And, to be clear: you aren't stupid. Resume construction and follow through is arguably harder than any junior role you actually end up in will be. |