|
|
|
|
|
by 1010100101
5314 days ago
|
|
Could it be that some or all of these things either already exist or are possible using existing "tools", but are simply not widely known nor in widespread use? However statements like "all the features that we need or want" are troublesome. How can we possibly agree on those? What if someone built the low-level, _boring_ "platform", and offered a _simple_ (as little code as possible), _old_, boring but workable conceptual vision, then let all the high-level enthusiasts address (argue about) usability and features? |
|
That last one was the least important and the most flippantly stated (apart from the global mesh network.)
>What if someone built the low-level, _boring_ "platform", and offered a _simple_, _old_, boring but workable conceptual vision, then let all the high-level ethusiasts address usability and features?
That's exactly what's going (think positive!) to happen, having a p2p facebook is just the last piece of the puzzle, the cherry on the cake.