[gwright]

While I realize that there are defensible reasons to actively reject some government directives the benefits of a lawful society should not be underestimated. Bad laws should be fixed via legislative action. Sometimes this means complying with the bad law in the interim.

Selective enforcement and/or selective non-compliance may be justifiable as a tactical response but if taken too far then we no longer have the rule of law.

[gnaritas]

Bad laws should be rejected via jury nullification; you can't count on legislators who were the ones to enact the bad law in the first place.