[hn_throwaway_99]

I'm always curious about how long this will continue (e.g. see the recent post on how Gen Z never learned cursive).

I got my ham radio license (since lapsed a long time ago) when I was a kid, back when you still had to pass a Morse code test. I was totally infatuated by it, and remember the excitement of being able to communicate with folks all around the world. I just lost interest with it when the Internet became widespread.

Also, unrelated point, but another reason that what this guy is doing is so impressive is that he is using a straight key. When I was a ham radio operator, pretty much all the ham's I knew used paddle keys, where you press the paddle to the right to get the "dots", and to the left to get the "dashes", but the interrupts are automatically done for you (i.e. holding it to the right gives you "dot dot dot ..." and holding it to the left gives you "dash dash dash ...", and the speed is set with a dial setting on the key), no need to tap. I can't imagine being this fast with a paddle key, let alone a straight key.

[wrycoder]

It's very common to build your own low power (5 watts) transmitter and use code. No fancy electronics or computers needed. People do it out in the woods from inside their sleeping bag in the dark.

Edit: [0][1]

[0] http://naqcc.info/

[1] http://www.qrpme.com/

[dbcurtis]

Well, I do radiosport contests, and most stations are sending around 30 WPM, the hot shots are faster of course. But anyway... I look at radiosport the same way that I look at sail boat racing. There is great fun in keeping the old skills alive, and nobody at your local yacht club thinks it is odd to learn a bunch of arcane knots and spend Saturday dashing around in circles. But nobody is suggesting that wooden ships powered by sail is a good way to bring container loads of merch from China. For me Morse contesting is the same — I would use FTP to fetch an ISO from Finland, but code is good humor on a random Saturday contest.

[jneumann004]

I got my license less than a year ago, but there is still an active amateur radio community. I'm apart of a few active amateur radio discords.

Between cw, digital modes, POTA/SOTA, YouTube, and everything that has been written in the last hundred years about radio there is a lot to learn. I joined because I like learning new things and radio has a lot to learn about.

[vvoid]

That's a fair question. The time slots I called out above are occupied by learners in the CWops academy. The density of transmissions can be so high that the waterfall resemble the opening to the Matrix. But clearly demographics are stacked against this part of the hobby.

[vitaflo]

There was a bit of a resurgence of CW during the pandemic. I know a few people who took to learning it during that time. Will it continue? I don’t know but there seems to be more CW traffic than SSB some days. So it’s certainly not dying.

[NegativeLatency]

The modern replacement seems to be some of the new mesh packet radio systems. Hard to argue with the simplicity/resiliency of the current setup though.

I've been ready to take the HAM test for a while but just keep procrastinating on doing it.

[MandieD]

I highly recommend HamStudy.org[0] - free online, or a $3.99 iOS/Android app. It keeps track of which questions you keep missing and will drill you on them. I found this approach was fantastic for passing the Technician exam, and also valid for the General, which I took a week or two later. The General license is worthwhile for the extra operating privileges, and not much more difficult than the Technician exam - just more stuff.

The Amateur Extra is much harder to cram for - more complicated questions, and more of them, and in the US, doesn't bring far more operating privileges than the General license. I did it so that I could convert it to a full German license, and it took a lot more studying for understanding than I did for the first two exams. I used "Amateur Radio Extra Class Licensing: For 2020 through 2024 License Examinations"[1] to understand the material, and "Pass Your Amateur Radio Extra Class Test - The Easy Way"[2] for shameless cramming.

Taking the exams online works out really well, as long as you have a room you can get totally clear and don't mind having three random but supportive volunteers watching you.

[0]https://hamstudy.org

[1]https://www.amazon.com/dp/B086JC6XRQ

[2]https://www.amazon.com/dp/B085BB2XG3

[wrycoder]

So go do it. It's easy, with the online practice tests [0][2].

A Technician license (the first one) can operate morse code in the old novice bands on 80, 40, 15, and 10 meters [1].

[0] http://www.arrl.org/licensing-education-training

[1] http://www.arrl.org/graphical-frequency-allocations

[2] http://www.arrl.org/On-the-Air-Magazine

[kube-system]

You can do CW entirely in software without learning it. I've been considering trying this out because the lower bands that technicians are permitted to use here in the US are CW and not voice.

[vitaflo]

Most of the software that decodes CW isn’t that great unless you have a consistent S9 signal and the keying is even (IE, not straight keyed). Once the signal wanders or is even partially in the noise the software will just spit out gibberish but a human would still easily be able to copy it.

[kube-system]

Maybe I’ll have to write some better software then

[bardan]

Fldigi seems pretty good at decoding straight keying amateurs from my experience.