[igouy]

> Goes to show…

Let's think about that for a moment.

No, it does not.

[boston_clone]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistence_hunting

[igouy]

fyi 2020 "Are humans evolved specialists for running in the heat? Man vs. horse races provide empirical insights"

https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/EP088502

[igouy]

Non-sequitur.

spiderfarmer claimed — Aidas Ardzijauskas's amazing feat "Goes to show" blah blah.

No, it does not.

You won't find anyone running 200 miles in descriptions of persistence hunting ;-)

[boston_clone]

I'm not sure why you're attempting to call out non-existent fallacies and having so much difficulty accepting the hypothesis.

The person in question averaged roughly 40 miles per day. The specific example provided in the wikipedia article - full of citations to supplementary materials - detail a group running up to 35 miles per day.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[igouy]

Neither Aleksandr Sorokin's 24-hour world record or Aidas Ardzijauskas's daily run have anything to say about persistence hunting.

Sorokin's run is way too fast. Aidas Ardzijauskas's run is too long and too frequent. For persistence hunting think walking and jogging.

Did you misread "The hunters run down an antelope, such as a kudu, … a distance of up to 35 km (22 mi)" as being 35 miles?

[boston_clone]

So it's not at all like persistence hunting - something done by traveling a long distance, usually running, over an extended period of time - because people are running for too far of a distance or for too long a time?

This is getting confusing, igouy.

[igouy]

You were already confused when you posted the wikipedia link.

Aleksandr Sorokin's 24-hour world record is an amazing feat. Aidas Ardzijauskas's daily run is an amazing feat.

They are not like observed persistence hunts.

So when `spiderfarmer` claims "Goes to show…" we can just say — No, it does not.