Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
devwastaken
1367 days ago
It's cases such as these invalidate the "they're not acting with malice". Thousands of google employees see this stuff, and are clearly being told they can't talk about it.
1 comments
pessimizer
1367 days ago
You haven't applied Hanlon's Razor properly. They're just coordinating incompetence that they find beneficial, not being malicious.
link
kwhitefoot
1367 days ago
If you are coordinating the incompetence then
you
are malicious even if the incompetent are not.
link
devwastaken
1367 days ago
Someone in authority said or inferred some version of "don't talk about this, don't get involved". That's malicious.
link
DangitBobby
1367 days ago
I think it's more likely that no one wanted to take ownership of it, so no one did.
link
GauntletWizard
1367 days ago
Sufficiently weaponized incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.
link
babypuncher
1367 days ago
The act of weaponizing incompetence is itself malicious.
link