Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by taeric 1373 days ago
Though, even there, networks are far faster than they used to be. Especially for the size is windows they used to push.
2 comments
Schroedingersat 1373 days ago
Latency hasn't really improved. Dial up or isdn to nearby cities was 25-50ms. Same as I get with hfc or 5g. Cable was slightly better where it was available. International pings got much worse from australia in the 2010s but since improved roughly back to where they were.

Bandwidth has increased by 3 orders of magnitude though.

link
icedchai 1373 days ago
Dial up latency was never that low. ISDN, yes, but traditional dialup modems were pretty bad. The analog-to-digital conversion introduced a couple hundred milliseconds of latency.
link
toast0 1373 days ago
I remember having latency under 100 ms within the metro area, but I could easily be misremembering, and I don't have a PPP account anymore to test. (And I'd have to visit my MIL who has a real POTS line with it's low latency)... But I did find a reference mentioning 150 ms round trips regionally, which I think was US west/east/central, so I think this 150ms is including some intercity latency as well.

https://web.archive.org/web/20160305000336/http://www.thefre...

link
icedchai 1371 days ago
Hmm. Wikipedia is claiming 150 ms latency on dialup: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dial-up_Internet_access

I remember higher, but it's been over 20 years now (we got broadband pretty early here), so who knows.

link
Schroedingersat 1373 days ago
Latency hasn't really improved. Dial up or isdn to nearby cities was 25-50ms. Same as I get with hfc or 5g.

Bandwidth has increased by 3 orders of magnitude though.

link