|
|
|
|
|
by throwaway894345
1365 days ago
|
|
I think the Internet doesn’t like languages that don’t have good, strong opinions that will help you find a successful path. C++ just says “here’s every feature we’ve ever heard of; good luck!” whereas Go has strong opinions about how you should build software and while they might change people, they really do put you on the right track. Rust is closer to Rust, but it has so many features that it still takes some time to figure out the happy path—fortunately, the Rust community makes up for a lot of that with excellent documentation (e.g., the Rust Book) and helpful, friendly forums. |
|
There's a very real desire for things to just be laid out for you, and much less regard for whether the workflow/tradeoffs associated with that beget quality software in the process.
It is hard to not see this as an army of advanced beginners unconsciously trying to avoid doing the work required to level up.