|
|
|
|
|
by humanrebar
1365 days ago
|
|
Yeah, fair. Very Online engineers complain about slow progress on free stuff for the open source toolchains. And they don't bother to light up ticketing systems on paid products. Microsoft and Apple don't spend as much on these things as you would expext. Because relevant management thinks we don't really care that much. But the common thread is that sitting back and expecting the world to come to you isn't reasonable. Incidentally, Google is a big place. Some Googlers are still involved in the ISO committees. Certain Googlers, admittedly influential ones, lost patience and started betting their reputations that certain dramatic moves would be a better choice. I personally don't think ISO is the presidency of C++. C++ culture focuses on language design way too much and engineering (good third party libraries, supporting implementation, empirical evidence, etc.) not nearly enough. |
|