|
|
|
|
|
by chucksmash
1366 days ago
|
|
> Don't pretend that "liability reasons" is due to ethical concerns about the safety of the product. Your view point is "the only reason any business might not want to electrocute people is because they've decided it won't be profitable after wrongful death suits"? Presumably you work for a business. Would you electrocute people if you determined it would be profitable after wrongful death suits? |
|