|
|
|
|
|
by vel0city
1373 days ago
|
|
This original post is someone using their phone number for two accounts. Having multiple accounts is against their rules, so it's abuse of their platform. Another user talking about being banned from Discord was supposedly involved with a server trading child pornography and then continuing to get banned by creating additional accounts which is once again against Discord's terms. I'm not seeing a lot of examples of people truly getting banned for no reason. It's not my place to tell Discord what is and isn't abuse of their platform. They're allowed to make their own membership rules. But please, answer my question. Is discord allowed to exclude those who they feel abuse their platform? That's kind of the key point here. |
|
Does that mean they cannot "exclude those who they feel abuse their platform"? That is a tendentious, disingenuous question.
Does that mean they should be obliged to have a legitimate justification for such action, and offer an avenue to challenge it? Yes.
Does it mean the list of justifications should be subject to public review? Yes.
Does it mean that permanent bans for trivial, correctable reasons should not meet the standards of such public review? Yes.