[daniele_dll]

Let me answer and then give you some background for my question.

> Which says you estimate 50-100 machines to saturate one "low-core count VM" Redis. But now you say you meant 50-100 machines for Redis servers?

No, I was referring to machines running business logic functionalities using Redis as part of their processing pipeline.

Said that, the reason for which I was asking for some numbers was to figure out if my expectation of "very often you need more room for the data than better performance" was making sense.

Because cachegrand will be able to store data on disk and to handle stream writes as well allowing to leverage the time series db, once fully implemented, it will able to cover a number of different needs. This combined with the ability to run Webassembly means that you will also be able to run whatever you want directly in place and data will not have to go out and in from multiple systems to be processing making the pipelines much faster and cheaper to run.

Of course it doesn't take 1 day, especially because I am working on cachegrand during my free time (e.g. At night or over the weekends).