Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by JAA1337 1377 days ago
Good response. I believe the right counter is "diminishing returns".

Yes, the bad actor can break in my door, but they actually have to do it. Walking through without a door is sooooo much easier.

But then when they get inside, what will they find? Will I have silver and gold bars? Or will it be random HN posts?

My advice is to take reasonable precautions. However, if you have your entire life savings in an offshore back account with Venmo access which doesn't require 2FA ... then yea, I would worry.

I believe things that are valuable, like truly valuable, should be hard to change. Like liquidating a 401k life savings shouldn't be a couple mouse clicks. It should be a long and hard process because you are prolly only going to once or twice in your life. There is nothing wrong IMO with requiring being present at a bank to perform significant value transfers. Sure, wouldn't it be nice to only have to click a button? Sure ... but requiring physical (think MFA) slows the process down for the sake of security.

1 comments

I agree, and I think your examples of Venmo, and liquidating your 401k are examples of where regulation is needed. Same goes for storing data, while many people hate the GDPR, I think forcing companies to delete personal data is an important piece of legislation. The same thing goes for the right to be forgotten even if it's by manual request.
Completely agree on GDPR. Unfortunately there is so much money to be made in selling to people. I hope legislation wins out.