|
|
|
|
|
|
by Bradley_A_Pliam
1383 days ago
|
|
|
What part is incorrect? That there is a desire and need for an observable beginning? That I said it "might", in other words, could potentially have come into play? I don't think you know that this has not happened. How can you possibly know? You are entitled to believe what you like, but use the word "incorrect" when you know something is false. Something is not necessarily false just because it contradicts your beliefs! |
|
|
Yes. That part. Hinduism doesn't have it. And again: Einstein explicitly added a constant term to an equation to make it so that his theory did NOT imply a beginning. He wasn't Hindu mind you. He was Jewish!
> You are entitled to believe what you like, but use the word "incorrect" when you know something is false
That seems a bit much honestly. It's like Christians saying "you don't KNOW there is no God!!!". But yea.. I do. I also know the fact about Einstein above.
Just because SOME people want to show there is a start of time, doesn't mean it's the prevailing scientific theory for that reason. In fact, again like I said above, we know this isn't so as a historical fact.