[boppo1]

>it can generate porn

It's not good at penises or vaginas, just breasts and butts. I can find what I like pornographically without ai. But the ducking and dodging around nudity and sexuality is childish and tiresome and we ought to discuss this topic as disinterestedly and nonchalantly as we do the other things it excels or struggles at. Penises and vaginas are not somehow more vile than other things.

Sure enough, sexual content ought to be age-gated and there is potential for abuse (slapping a person's face onto explicit imagery without their consent isn't cool yall). But are we working toward AGI or not? Because at some point it's gonna have to know about the birds and the bees.

[jes]

I think you mean vulva, not vagina[1]. Vaginas are mostly internal.

[1] https://www.allure.com/story/vagina-vulva-difference-planned...

[ofrzeta]

> to know about the birds and the bees

:) made me chuckle. AGI would need to know how to be evil, as well, right?

[airtonix]

isn't it obvious yet?

we're creating the speakwrite machine.

[eurasiantiger]

Are we talking about Artificial God Intelligence?