[heavyset_go]

Something tells me you had a knee-jerk reaction to an Al Jazeera URL, and then didn't even bother to read any of the citations.

If you had read them, you would have seen that the experts cited in the CNN article, like Gilles Verniers[1], a Catholic, certainly are not Muslim.

Either way, this is the classic ad hominem fallacy.

[1] https://www.ashoka.edu.in/profile/gilles-verniers/

[karthikk]

i wouldnt trust al jazeera nor cnn as they have a hinduphobic stance. yes, i dont bother even opening their links. case in point - check these sites how much they have spoken about hindu massacres in moplah, bengal or kashmir or any of the innumerable instances of hindus being victims. the answer is most likely zero(dont trust me, do a search), they arent neutral but simply parroting an agenda.

so yea any other sources?

[heavyset_go]

Yeah, I'm not doing your homework for you. If you want to assert that your ad hominem attack on sources is legitimate, instead of engaging with the content of those sources, you're free to prove it. Your feelings on the matter, however, are not proof.