[nindalf]

That’s very cleverly put by you.

But it doesn’t have to be so black and white. A person can be kind, thoughtful, help poor folks out … and still harbour hateful ideologies in their heart. Humans are complicated enough that this contradiction is common enough. You think the people who supported the KKK never gave to charity?

For non-Indians, some background on the RSS. This was the organisation which was banned for involvement in the assassination of Gandhi. When they were unbanned, it was predicated on a promise of never being involved in politics and elections. They got around that by creating a political wing (the BJP, ruling India for the last 8 years).

Till date, the RSS is committed to the core ideology of Hindutva, which envisions India as a purely Hindu state, made solely of Hindus. That’s ominous, considering the hundreds of millions of Indian Muslims and Christians.

Lastly, it’s curious that you call out the bogeyman of “media opposition”. Very Trump like. What you fail to mention is that nearly all the media is allied to the BJP-RSS. The few holdouts (like NDTV) will soon be taken over as well.

[unmole]

> India as a purely Hindu state, made solely of Hindus

I don't have any sympathy for Sanghis but this isn't accurate. They have a majoritarian conception of nationalism but they don't envision a state where minorities do not exist. Hell, the RSS has a Muslim wing, the Muslim Rashtriya Manch.

The most despicable hate mongers like Adityanath and Sakshi Maharaj are not actually RSS members. The RSS is moderate in comparison. This is a function of the Overton Window has shifting to an extent but also because the RSS has mellowed.

[musingmuslim]

> According to the party's official documents, Indian Muslims and Christians are still descendants of Hindus that happened to be converted to foreign faiths, so as long as they agree with its beliefs they can also be members. They are still required to attend the shakhas, and recite Hindu hymns, even by breaking Ramadhan fasts when possible. [1]

As long as you participate in Hindu rituals and changing how you practice your own (breaking fast). This also sounds like as a non-Hindu you are declaring your ‘foreign’ faith as inferior to Hinduism.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashtriya_Swayamsevak_Sangh#St...

[nindalf]

I think it would be helpful if you read the book Hindutva by Vinayak Savarkar, the founder of the RSS. You’d be surprised by how closely they’ve followed the blueprint of hate and division set out by him 100 years ago.

Here’s a review of the book - https://reddit.com/r/india/comments/qsdvhb/understanding_hin...

[unmole]

> Vinayak Savarkar, the founder of the RSS

Savarkar was not the founder of the RSS. He ridiculed cow worship, ate beef and encouraged the consumption of meat and eggs. He did not exert any significant pull on the RSS and never got along with Golwalkar. I think it would be helpful if you read actual history.

[nindalf]

> After reading V. D. Savarkar's Hindutva, published in Nagpur in 1923, and meeting Savarkar in the Ratnagiri prison in 1925, Hedgewar was extremely influenced by him, and he founded the RSS with the objective of strengthening Hindu society.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashtriya_Swayamsevak_Sangh.

Savarkar's ideas, especially that book (Hindutva), have always been influential. I strongly suggest reading the summary I linked. I agree that Savarkar wasn't religious, and it's fascinating how he managed to square that with his stance on Hindutva.

Here's another interesting thing - can you imagine a Marathi recommend that all Indians speak Hindi? Except that's exactly what he did.

> I think it would be helpful if you read actual history.

This is needlessly snarky. Please be better than this.

[intimidated]

As you were writing your reply, I edited my post.

Media in India have indeed taken a right turn the past decade, veering steadily away from their western counterparts.

I initially included the word "media" because, just like most places on Earth, journalists in India have far more say than normal people, and RSS's loudest opposition comes from media types.

[SyzygistSix]

Or be pragmatic and work with whatever government exists to garner support his mission, which in his case seems like a positive one on the whole.

[nindalf]

No. That’s not the case. His company is based in Tamil Nadu, where the cancer of Hindu nationalism has not yet spread. He certainly has to work with the state government, but the no ruling party in TN has ever grabbed votes based on hatred of and violence towards non-Hindu people.

For a Tamil person to go out of their way to endorse Hindu nationalism isn’t pragmatism, it’s hatred.