|
|
|
|
|
|
by RustyRussell
1381 days ago
|
|
|
Yes, I would second this. It's hard to rewrite, but needs it in many places that I've read (in particular, the code to detect BIP9 etc soft fork activation is horrible). To be fair, the slow polishing of a thousand hands continues. libsecp256k1 is tested to a level few if any FOSS libraries achieve, for example. |
|
|