[tptacek]

That article was, of course, deeply misleading and was more or less refuted days after it was published when Oberlin's appeals process concluded.

[Balgair]

I'm a bit confused here. How was it refuted? I'm not sure up to date on the whole thing and only really remember the substack article where she kinda admits that the store is run for sentimental reasons.

[tptacek]

It's an article about how Oberlin was refusing to pay a defamation award --- which it was not, it was simply exhausting its appeals --- which was followed almost immediately by Oberlin paying the defamation award.