[marttt]

".. like many UK media outlets in the past few years, there seems to be a push to "globalize" the product .. also in reducing the cynicism and irreverence that used to make UK media worth reading even for people who weren't living in the UK."

Isn't this actually a more general cultural shift. On the societal level, or on the level of the entire developed world. It often feels like people are simply tired of cynicism these days.

Being a trained journalist, I have observed something similar in my own country: former witty, extremely-clever-but-cynical outlets have changed to a more neutral style in recent years. I do think this is an obvious win for journalism, or at least for investigative reporting. They can possibly dig a little deeper this way. More focus on the hard work of bringing serious problems to light, less focus on crafting mean headlines.

Also, as a side note, I'd say it is actually much easier to write a "cynical" headline as compared to one that is not mean, but still playful and multi-layered. IMO cynicism is mostly a low-hanging fruit; which is why this is such a common "closet addiction" in many newsrooms.

[nocoiner]

Every single headline in The New Republic used to be a delightfully clever gem, but at some point in the past two decades, that practice descended into mediocrity alongside the outlet as a whole.

[sn0w_monkie]

I have noticed the British spelling of words has disappeared too. Is every writer there murican now?

[mc32]

Noah's revenge, surely.

[papageek]

Sounds like Walmart and McDonalds slowly replacing local options.

[PointlessLogin]

> former witty, extremely-clever-but-cynical outlets have changed to a more neutral style in recent years.

Which is why Private Eye is so popular and has record sales figures!

(Hint: It remains as British and as cynical as ever)