| The `print` statement in perl has always behaved more or less as it does in the "other languages" you describe. `say` removes the need for anyone to write their own "I'm tired of the manual newline ritual" function and provides a standard for where the newline is added. That's a marginal convenience, but given the frequency with which people either do write their own or newline inconsistency gets encountered (or both), it's a reasonable one. And it's in pieces like this one not because it's a huge thing to crow about, but to illustrate the opt-in nature of incremental changes or sets of changes to perl. `say` is also about 15 years old, like Time::Piece. The author is not announcing features that are new to the whole world, just new to a certain audience, possibly including the author. This is also true of the filehandle scoping feature (which is 22 years old). If you find the old bare filehandle scope behavior only notable enough to hurl a drive-by "bonkers" at it then I suppose that's one way of advertising that you haven't spent much time thinking about unix shell utilities and associated features/issues. Function signatures are slightly younger than typescript, or at least, the most familiar syntax for them; both the old and more recent means are essentially naming a list of arguments. In general: perl is an opportunity to think about programming languages differently. There's a lot of contexts in which I never use it anymore, but it's rare to find people with substantial insights who casually disparage it. |