[simonh]

>Poor you to have to read a rational argument in a comment using history and logic

Your comment above didn't actually contain any such thing. It contained a vestigial semblance of them too trivialised by vitriol to land a persuasive point.

>Sacarstic people are mean and don't understand how to have quality discussions.

Not always for sure, but yes that's often the case.

[BiteCode_dev]

Oh but this comment is part of a thread. Because comments are in a context. Like this one, from 6 hours ago:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32763171