|
|
|
|
|
by eesmith
1385 days ago
|
|
It wasn't meant to be a convincing argument. It was meant to show your comment at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32741165 wasn't a relevant parallel, because it ignored how "a+=1" and "a=a+1" are different. For a more convincing use, consider NumPy arrays, where a+=1 re-use the same (potentially very large) array, while a=a+1 creates a new array. import numpy
a = b = numpy.array([[1,2], [3, 9]])
a += 1 # modify in-place
a = a + 1 # create a new array
>>> a
array([[ 3, 4],
[ 5, 11]])
>>> b
array([[ 2, 3],
[ 4, 10]])
In-place modification can improve performance over using intermediate/temporary arrays. |
|