|
|
|
|
|
by linuxftw
1388 days ago
|
|
> As I already stated, these are not the kind of managers we see in development where your manager is your "boss". We're talking about the kind of managers software engineers have. Doctors don't have those kind of managers, that's entirely my point. > Again, this is very insulting to the people working these roles. They are not "subordinate". They are definitely subordinate in any patient-care scenario. Anyway, I feel like you're missing the point of the analogy, analogies aren't perfect, and you know well what I meant. If you want to argue lawyers and doctors have managers, fine, give engineers that kind of a manager. IMO, these are subordinate clerical people. |
|
Your analogy is bad only because you have no idea what you're talking about. Technical people need managers because technical people will do things other than their actual jobs and I say this very frankly as a developer. It is remarkable how similar doctors and engineers can be in that they are lost if left to their own devices. Just as an experienced engineer will wear many hats and can manage themselves, experienced doctors also successfully set up their own practices where they can manage themselves. But a good hospital manager can literally save and change lives