[design-of-homes]

My first impressions are favourable. There are contraints though, as the design guide acknowledges:

> WikiHouse is intended for buildings of up to 3 storeys. This covers 95% of all buildings, and allows gentle density neighbourhoods of up to around 75 dwellings per hectare.

> The main constraint on height is not gravity, but wind. In high winds, lightweight structures are more prone to slight lateral flexing, which is not allowed within most building codes. Further structural research and testing is ongoing.

[actually_a_dog]

I'm kinda curious about this. Under the International Building Code, you can build wood frame buildings up to 6 storeys tall [0]. Granted, this is not actually wood frame construction, but I don't see why a building built this way would be any less structurally sound than a traditionally built wood frame building.

---

[0]: https://seagatemasstimber.com/how-tall-are-tall-wood-buildin...

[criddell]

Maybe it has to do with lack of bracing? When my home was being built I noticed lots of metal straps going between studs in an X-formation. I wonder if that was to make lots of triangles to add rigidity?

[redtexture]

Yes.

This can also be provided by sheet materials like plywood, securely attached, providing diagonal structure preventing racking of the frame.

In older houses, sheathed with one inch by eight or ten or twelve inch boards, diagonal wood bracing was cut into the two by four inch wall studs for diagonal bracing and structure.

[quixoticelixer-]

You can built wood frame buildings much taller. And wood framing is stiffer especially if you are using mass timber.