|
|
|
|
|
|
by ajross
1377 days ago
|
|
|
> Ebright simply stated what all existing evidence points to, that the closest candidate bats are 1000 miles away You added the word "candidate". I agree with what you wrote. Your framing doesn't imply an incorrect conclusion, though it also lacks any rhetorical punch (probably the reason Ebright skipped it) since we don't have any "candidate" leak evidence either. Good job. |
|
|