[nullc]

Not a good sign that it gets bitcoin wrong by a factor of 5-ish: https://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/softwa...

and then places at #2 because it erroneously just divides the ethereum stakable supply up by 32 and counts that as 'validators' when it's really just a small number of entities. That would be like claiming that bitcoin has some number of trillion 'validators' because it performs that many sha256 operations per unit time, or counting each 1e-8 btc as a 'validator' because anyone that owns bitcoin at all is incentivized to validate and protect the network or other such meaningless metric.