[epgui]

There's about a million different ways you could do a PhD on this subject: data on this question is not missing.

Some search queries I recommend (just as a starting point):

- "Factors in access to education"

- "Access to education causal"

- "Access to education in America"

- "Access to education world data"

- "Access to education developing countries"

- "Public education and vertical mobility"

- "Relationship between education and innovation"

- "Relationship between education and health"

- "Public health and economic productivity

- "Access to education and marginalized groups"

[jschveibinz]

Here is a website for the ACLU that you can use as a reference. If you believe that any child is being denied access to education, the ACLU is a good place to go to get assistance in getting justice:

https://www.aclu.org/other/your-right-equality-education

[throwabro789]

This is also really reductionist. “Good spots” were scarce in China, Japan and the USSR too. You could be (1) Asian in China, (2) cognitively capable (3) but still part of the group of 19 kids who didn’t get the 1 spot that 1 kid did. And you were fucked, and you didn’t emigrate.

The “racial or cultural superiority therefore black kids are fucked” thing you’re really believe in is stupid. It’s unactionable and nobody gives a fuck about that perspective. There are like a handful of legitimate ways to address the scarce spots for everyone not just high achievers, but the racial and cultural superiority people don’t spend even one iota of their time or one cent of their dollars making the good schools bigger. It’s a profoundly immature point of view, and its immaturity should give you insight for why people don’t like you.

[epgui]

I don't think the reference you provided makes the point you think it makes. The ACLU states that their mission is to fight for better access to education. Nowhere do they say that their job is done.