|
|
|
|
|
by _8j50
1379 days ago
|
|
That's why I said vote. But not neccesarily, companies are not people they are not protected by the bill of rights and this is already happening when LE forcibly takeover domains to censor them with cause of course. Also, freedom of speech does not include speech made with thr intent and effect of causing demonstrable harm. |
|
Constitutional amendments are so tricky that I'm not sure if just going out to vote is gonna change anything.
>Also, freedom of speech does not include speech made with thr intent and effect of causing demonstrable harm.
I don't think that is a legal standard for the First Amendment. Advocacy of violence is protected speech under the First Amendment.