[mb7733]

I'll save everyone the quick search. They added really basic opt-in telemetry, and then removed it after an out-of-proportion outcry.

[robocat]

Good write-up here: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/07/no-open-source-audac...

It wasn’t clear it was opt-in (although maybe the code was clear?).

Either way, adding telemetry (especially to open source) is obviously going to cause a ruckus, so they obviously mishandled the situation.

[swyx]

i dont understand privacy maniacs. have telemetry in from the start, nobody bats an eye. add it later, everyone freaks.

[hutzlibu]

Simple, privacy "maniacs" do not install something with telemetry integrated by default.

So of course they freak, when it is suddenly creeping in, in something they trusted.

[eurasiantiger]

In the first case, intentions are clear from the start, so user trust can be built.

In the second case, intentions have been hidden or they have changed, which obviously erodes user trust.

[tuckerpo]

especially if it's opt-in (which is provable since the project is entirely open-source) -- can people simply _not_ opt-in if they disagree with telemetry?