[dang]

It looks like you have some substantive points, but can you please not be aggressive like this on HN?

I appreciate that you're watching out for the quality of the site, but you broke the site guidelines here, which is no doubt why users flagged your post.

Beyond that, your points would be much more persuasive if you made them more neutrally, without this kind of attack.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

[dannywarner]

I am sorry @dang I apologize for the aggressive tone of my comment and not making a better argument without the anger. The promotion felt blatant. I let it get to me (every comment I believe at the time - and many other recent posts). It was wrong and I'm sorry.

Fwiw this was the source of the self-promotion.

https://kagifeedback.org/d/887-comment-on-hn-discussion-of-k...

[Semaphor]

Just to let you know, I flagged your original comment because, as dang said, it was too aggressive, personally attacking me. I’m enthusiastic about Kagi, but certainly not a shill.

The kagifeedback thread you posted was also by another (imo too enthusiastic) user of kagi with no relation to the devs.