Sorry, but I'm not following. How do you make the connection from going out in public to you have to accept what others do? It feels like you're bringing in NAP or something without actually saying it.
No, I mean, please explain why you have to accept what others do. Are there people who are going to make me? If so, then they have some justification to do so - what is it?
> No, I mean, please explain why you have to accept what others do.
Because the law allows them and prevents you stopping them.
> Are there people who are going to make me?
Police officers perhaps. Depending what you mean by not accepting it.
> If so, then they have some justification to do so - what is it?
Who and what? I don't really follow. People are free to look at what they like in public. I feel I'm repeating myself, I don't quite know what the difficulty is with this.
Thanks for your patience. I'm trying to understand your first principles, and they seem to be what is lawful is moral and what is moral is lawful. I simply find it difficult to accept that as an axiom.
NAP is the non-aggression principle[1]. I brought it up, not because I agree or disagree with it, but to jump to that part of the dialog were that your basis for framework.
That's the thing about going about in public, you have accept that others will be there and tolerate what they do even if you don't like it.
Try go acting the clown in public and see if people won't stare and record you.