|
|
|
|
|
|
by tragictrash
1380 days ago
|
|
|
I think usually is a very strong and very incorrect word here. I understand what you're getting at, but I think you greatly underestimate the amount of incorrect assertions that need to happen before a sensible consensus is reached. Historically, in the body of science, we're wrong something like 99% of the time until someone gets it right. Also, your comment is a straw man argument. The law isn't going to chastise people questioning existing mainstream views, only the ones spouting horribly incorrect information. Noone is saying it will do that, other than you and other commenters who didnt read the article. Last, are you really questioning the benefit of washing our hands? |
|
|
It's dishonest to call his position a strawman then take a strawman position that doesn't have bearing on the rest of your statement.
Along with that, this law was just passed. We don't yet know what it will and won't be used for. You're arguing about what it should and shouldn't be used for.