|
|
|
|
|
|
by dwohnitmok
1386 days ago
|
|
|
> So looking at both DALL-E and Stable Diffusion, it is yet another contribution that advances the dystopian AI industry Given that there are more powerful models that have already been developed, should they be gatekeeped or released? |
|
|
> I am still against OpenAI’s gatekeeping and gave AI itself a chance to be more used for good and significantly less dystopian.
> Worse part is that they haven't built any detectors for this.
So it is neither. If a given AI project has no detectors or a straight indicator of knowing that it is generated by an AI, then the whole project should be effectively scrapped and cancelled, postponed, etc until it has one. It is that simple. And No. DALL-E 2's tiny watermark doesn't count.
'AI researchers' know the dystopian scam that they are creating and they know that they need detectors and analyzers for them to significantly reduce the risk of malicious use. So it doesn't matter if there are others that are more powerful as the conditions are still the same.