Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Autre 5316 days ago
I was deliberately excluding the constructor situation. I should have made that clearer in my previous comment. I think the way out of the constructor mess is not to require them at all.

I do think the Object.getPrototypeOf approach is feasible for methods.
1 comments
Raynos 5316 days ago
the method fails for the exact same reason.

If a single method calls a super method and that method calls another super method then it fails.

    Object.getPrototypeOf(this).method
Always have one value and only one value, calling it more then once leads to infinite recursion.
link