Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ipaddr 1384 days ago
Taxes raise in rural areas to pay for these systems.
2 comments

The costs are negligible to every corp bailouts in the last 50 years or the cumex scandal. With the money corps extracted through illegal means with cumex we would have free transportation for the next 30 years.
Roads are vastly more expensive than transit per trip. If having the busses and trains full avoids yet another widening then taxes go down, and the rural + urban areas stop subsidizing the suburbs.
The one time cost of widening roads go down but the additional transit line costs which are yearly outweigh those costs and continue.
You need 20 or so lanes of freeway and 200m^2 of parking per car (paid for collectively through enforced parking minimums) and on/off ramps and arterials and collectors and double the per area infrastructure (sewers, water, power, drainage) to match the capacity of a single two way train line with right of way. Once you have that you need to pay upkeep on all of it which is more than the transit costs. Then you still need to widen it because it's full so you're out even more. And that's not counting all the externalities which absolutely dwarf those costs.

The 'one time cost' is something you're signing up to do every year at ever increasing cost until you go bankrupt or give up and build transit.