|
|
|
|
|
by neogodless
1390 days ago
|
|
TDP is not a measure power consumption across the range, but only at "maximum theoretical load"[0]. If you missed the presentation, look for in-depth coverage[1]. These chips are more efficient than Zen 3, consuming less power for the same performance. The higher TDP allows for higher multi-core clocks and much higher performance, but that's not the same thing as power consumption (across all levels of performance). Sure, if you can use the power at the high end, you can consume more power, but you'll get a lot more performance out of it. [0] https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000... > TDP stands for Thermal Design Power, in watts, and refers to the power consumption under the maximum theoretical load. [1] https://www.anandtech.com/show/17552/amd-details-ryzen-7000-... |
|
That's coverage from the slides, a.k.a. marketing. I don't doubt that this will be a significant performance/efficiency improvement, given the soft cap, but desktop is another thing. TDP has been correlated with average consumption, on Intel CPUs, and all the GPUs. It'd be surprising that this didn't apply to this specific CPU family.