Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by SadTrombone 1391 days ago
This Proxies API service seems to be using AI-generated "This Person Does Not Exist"[1] style profile pictures for its positive customer reviews near the bottom of the page:

https://www.proxiesapi.com/assets/img/steve.jpg

https://www.proxiesapi.com/assets/img/customer1.jpg

https://www.proxiesapi.com/assets/img/customer3.jpg

https://www.proxiesapi.com/assets/img/customer4.jpg

Makes me question if the customer reviews or even the customers themselves are real.

[1] https://this-person-does-not-exist.com/

5 comments

I can't find any evidence any of those people, or the companies they purport to represent, actually exist. One thing to slap faces where you don't have any, but straight up making up reviews, people AND the company is actually hilarious
Almost every restaurant website uses stock photos as well - "oh this place looks nice" and tineye reveals that indeed the stock photographer made it look nice as well.

Logos, customer reviews, etc. are just tricks.

I read the "How to recognize an image of a fake person" section on the site you linked and I'm curious how did you spot that the pictures are fake?
If you see enough of these AI-generated portraits on the Internet you'll start to notice the similarities, especially since This Person Does Not Exist is usually the source for the vast majority of them that I've seen. They're very often used as profile pics by Twitter bots.

The way the person's head is framed in the shot is pretty much identical most of the time and kind of a tell on its own.

Other tells:

- steve.jpg: The skin above the top rim of his glasses has some repetition/distortion.

- customer1.jpg: Distortion in the hair, most noticeable at top left. Mouth looks fake too.

- customer3.jpg: I didn't notice anything significant, but it just looks like an image taken straight off TPDNE. Do "vibes" count?

- customer4.jpg: The teeth merge into each other.

Another tell is that they often look cropped from a larger image, specifically not from the center. Lenses produce specific distortions towards the edges. It looks like to increase the corpus of images many headshots have been cropped from larger images. This causes the model to learn and replicate these subtle lens effects.
> - customer3.jpg: I didn't notice anything significant, but it just looks like an image taken straight off TPDNE. Do "vibes" count?

Look at the background, does it make sense? Tell me what the background to the left of hear head is. Look at her earbobs, how often do people wear different ones in each ear? Does the left earbob look like anything?

Hmm, thanks. To me those look like random compression artefacts or poor photo retouching but I get what you mean and they do all look similar.

I guess you can get used to the distortions and the general vibe of the model.

For me a big giveaway on customer3.jpg is earrings - they don't have a real shape and don't match at all.
Good catch.
Go to https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ and spend a few minutes refreshing the page. There's something distinctive about all these fake faces - I can't explain what it is, but once you've seen enough of them you can recognise the "look" quite easily.

Probably the biggest giveaway is that the faces are all positioned identically in each photo, but there's something else that juuuust quite doesn't look real. Maybe some of the faces just seem a little bit more androgynous than anyone I ever see in real life. There's something about them that sits just on the edge of the uncanny valley.

Outside from the odd file names, minor details like ears, glasses, earrings.

Our friend Steve has something going on with the left hinge of his glasses.

Customer1 has an interesting right ear.

Customer3 has very asymmetrical earrings.

Customer4 has a bulge where the left earring would normally be, and the right hinge of their glasses is crooked.

I think the image names gives it away more.

"customer1.jpg" and "steve.jpg" lol

Usually eyes are not completely symmetrical.
Yeah the reviews on the landing page seem fake. It's the kind of fake it till you make it that doesn't bother me. It's not like he's faking blood tests.
Problem is that it makes you question the whole post. Ie does he actually have 100 customers or is it just something he writes because it is well known that people are less likely to buy something no one else is buying.
Yeah, you never worry about doing business with an out-and-out liar, of course?
It’s one thing if Reddit founders post news articles themselves on their free site. It’s another if a saas site has fake reviews.
I think this is actually quite common now - where you get permission from a person to use their review of your product but they don't want you to use their likeness.

Maybe sometimes it feels a bit much to ask to use someone's review and also ask for a photo of them.

It is somewhat disingenuous but I don't think I mind too much if they are legit customer reviews.

Try googling the names, job titles and companies of the people who "wrote" these reviews. I can't see any evidence that these people (and in some cases their companies) actually exist.

I don't believe that these testimonials are real.

When compared to a similar site hosted on the same server[1] the reused pictures and reviews are definitely suspicious[2].

[1] https://teracrawler.io/

[2] see the Our customers feel it section

Actually teracrawler.io and proxiesapi.com are build by the same person, same page design, same footer design (left column of topics, no privacy and terms policy pages), even is the same chat software with the same customer support operator picture.
Sure, that's how I found it, there's links to each other in the menu. I didn't mean to suggest the services themselves are fake, I didn't word it well - just that the pictures and reviews are reused on similar but different services.
The pricing is very different, could be some kind of test to see how much people are willing to pay