|
|
|
|
|
by theplumber
1386 days ago
|
|
My point is that they never intend to hold it thus I see their "support" as a kind of "fake trades"/ pump. They "support" the price until enough bag-holders start buying. Isn't that the very definition of pump & dump? Perhaps more correctoy it's pump<with limit> & dump. |
|
The activities of the market makers are well disclosed in a comprehensive IPO disclosure document. Importantly, any relationship between the underwriters and the company they are underwriting is well disclosed.
Meanwhile, folks tout the transparency of the public ledger, but actually the transparency is very shallow and disclosure is very poor, particularly around conflicts of interest.
Additionally, if the company lies to make the "pump" you can put the shares back to the company (per the securities act).
You just have to look at what happened to WeWork to see the IPO disclosure process successfully killing a bad company.
Beyond that point (is it necessary?) an IPO in the US is heavily regulated, disclosure by the SEC, underwriter activities by FINRA and the listing itself by the stock exchange.
I don't think you can call IPO market support "pump and dump".