Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by photochemsyn 1389 days ago
It all depends on how long you want to wait. Last time CO2 levels were as high as today was the mid-Pliocene, with temperatures estimated 2-3C higher than today and sea levels estimated 16 meters higher than today. A slow steady melt of Greenland and West Antarctica would take hundreds or thousands of years:

> "We acknowledge that this sea-level rise would not happen overnight. It would take hundreds to thousands of years to melt such large amounts of ice. Another important finding of our study is that, under temperatures ~4 °C higher than pre-industrial values and elevated CO2 during Pliocene Climatic Optimum, the global mean sea level reached 23.5 m (with an uncertainty range of 9.0-26.7 m) higher than present. This indicates that significantly more ice will melt if temperatures stabilize at this level. This estimate can serve as a target for future ice sheet model calibrations."

https://thesciencebreaker.org/breaks/earth-space/pliocene-se...

This particular article seems to point to 2-3 meter sea level rise by 2100, which looks to be on the higher end of what NOAA puts on their website as the 'observed trend', which looks more like a 1-3 ft sea level rise estimate by 2100. According to their graphics, by 2030 or 2040 it should be more clear which way things are really going, real-world evidence wise.

https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/...

1 comments

While I can see the logic behind how long it would take to melt all this ice, what about the risk that it will suddenly (in the long view) slide off and start floating around? That will raise sea level by the same amount without needing to melt.
It's worth noting, the last time there was this much CO2 in the atmosphere (>400ppm), sea levels were significantly higher. Estimates are all over the map, but most of them put global sea at least 10m above our current levels.

A few sources:

https://www.noaa.gov/news-release/carbon-dioxide-now-more-th...

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1543-2?proof=t

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1233137

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2012.029...

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/200...

EDIT: Fix words.