|
|
|
|
|
|
by pbhjpbhj
5324 days ago
|
|
|
Could you please present your "am[p]le scientific evidence [...] that sexual orientation can't be changed". I'll present an anecdote which, amongst several I've seen/heard, suggests to me that you're wrong in your assertion. "On Freddie Mercury's Sexuality 'I think it was an undiscussed thing for a long time. The truth of the matter is nobody should care. Why should anyone care what sexual persuasion people have? It's about the music, and Freddie would have been the first to say that. He never hid the fact that he was turned on by men instead of by women, but strange enough, I don't think it was always the case. Because in the early days, we used to share rooms. So in the early days, I know who Freddie slept with, and they weren't men, but I think it gradually changed. And I have no idea how these things work, but it wasn't really anybody's business but his, and we never talked about it as if it were important. Why should it be important? We just made music together.'" quoted from http://m.npr.org/news/front/128935865?singlePage=true |
|
|
I do not have scientific studies, and do not know off hand if there are scientific studies. But there are loads of people who went through these 'treatments', and it didn't work.
And there are plenty of gay men who would have slept with women when they were younger. Especially in the 1960s/70s UK. Just look at all the married, right wing coversative politicans who are caught with male prostitutes.