|
|
|
|
|
by hosh
1394 days ago
|
|
I can dig microswales and basins, following the terrain that is already there and no one will really notice, especially if I level it with mulch. It won't look like it's a water harvesting structure. There's a lot more than just swales. Something even as simple as a waffle pattern on flat ground for a garden or a crop is not something that would trigger fights about water rights. In Arizona, water gets washed away into these storm pipes. Curb cuts are one pattern to fill a basin from water that would already be draining away on surface streets. It's done so that when the basin is full, the backpressure lets the water continue going down the street. That didn't trigger things about water rights in Tuscon. Even swales that are created as small length trenches on uplands slow down water. I don't think people downstream are going to notice, other than perhaps, they are somehow getting more water for their use with less variability. Water rights may be more interesting to you; I used to work for a legaltech startup, and while I didn't encounter water rights, I know that stuff like that can get complicated fast. However, for me, these permaculture design patterns are practical, in use, and solve the underlying problems that water rights badly try to solve. And maybe that is also because I'm sympathetic to those practicing guerilla gardening. |
|