|
|
|
|
|
|
by oedo
1396 days ago
|
|
|
>when you do the same in other languages you get... Your result should be unsurprising. Lisps have a minimal syntax that naturally entails high levels of nesting: (s-)expressions being used to represent functions, control structures, data, etc. Why should a particular style convention appropriate for that kind of language necessarily transplant well to JavaScript-- a brace-delimited, Algol-inspired language with a lot of syntax? |
|
|