Also, you didn't even bother to read or comprehend what we're arguing about. The commenter labels author unreliable narrator because his google search provided shaky evidence about the meaning of the word, yet he ignores the entire article after the introduction. It's nitpicking and there's no evidence that the person who wrote the negative comment even read the rest of the article.
You're strengthening his strawman argument by providing, yet again, false evidence.
There's more than 1 Slavic language, and given that word "slave" comes from "slavic", you'd think that there's some relation to our elders being aware of forced work and its impact.
Also, you didn't even bother to read or comprehend what we're arguing about. The commenter labels author unreliable narrator because his google search provided shaky evidence about the meaning of the word, yet he ignores the entire article after the introduction. It's nitpicking and there's no evidence that the person who wrote the negative comment even read the rest of the article.
You're strengthening his strawman argument by providing, yet again, false evidence.
There's more than 1 Slavic language, and given that word "slave" comes from "slavic", you'd think that there's some relation to our elders being aware of forced work and its impact.