| I think with the popular conception/definition of walkability and the assigned importance of that conception is a little over-rated. I personally feel like it overvalues commercial activity (restaurants, retail, grocery, entertainment). Obviously, it depends on how often you want to partake in said commercial activities as far as how you would value it. I would love if the conception of walkability could also take into account: 'How far can I walk without having to worry about cars/crossing streets/waiting for lights?' 'How safe/comfortable is the walk? Will I be walking by people who will harass me/be high on drugs/try to sell me something?' 'How easy is it to string together a run without having to stop?' 'How busy are the sidewalks? Will I have to be dodging people on their phones all the time?' 'Is it easy to take a dog for a walk? Or are there limited green spaces?' 'Are there social/interest groups nearby that meet up?' I find some of these types of factors much more important than closeness to X number of commercial venues. So a busy downtown street may get a high walkability score (i.e. Walk Score) because of the restuarants/retail/theaters, but it might be atrocious to my conception of walkability. |
Link: https://www.walkscore.com/score/Times-Square-New-York