[throwaway8582]

> But scientists are subjective and biased

Maybe, but how much does that matter? If the bias of these scientists is leading them to publish incorrect or low quality research, then Nature should reject it on the grounds that it's bad science. The fact that Nature feels the need to publish this is basically an admission that the political ideology of their leadership is not able to stand up to scientific scrutiny.

> What do you think happened in Nazi Germany?

Probably something a lot like this: Powerful institutions sacrificing objectivity to push propaganda and ideology