[timeon]

I do have rss feed that pings me when there is Rust on HN as that is focus of my interest.

Under every article about Rust there is comment complaining about Rust in the title. Why do you have to do this? If you are not interested just move on.

[austinjp]

To you it's a useful flag. To me it's unnecessary noise. There's very little "written in Java", "written in C" or whatever. I'm sure C/Java programmers would find those eye-catching, but they seem to manage without.

The Rust community seems noisy compared to others.

And besides... Why do _you_ have to reply to the reply? Why don't _you_ just move on? :) Hopefully because we are curious people who want to develop our understanding of each other?

[techdragon]

It’s sort of like metadata, your right about less “in Java/C/etc” but there are other languages that are more vocal about indicating this, Python comes to mind, Go is a semi-frequent user of the “written in” addendum. I like rust and I like seeing the growth of the ecosystem and discovering new libraries like this. To me having this is a big help. For a language I don’t like like Perl or Go, its also nice to know I can ignore it, or alternatively check it out to see if anyone suggested similar libraries in other languages, something which happens often enough I got into the habit of quickly skimming such threads for links.

There’s value in the metadata of “written in $X” allowing you to know what to expect. If HN had tags or something like that we could filter it instead but it doesn’t and so we’re all just experimenting with alternative labeling schemes.