|
|
|
|
|
by newman314
5325 days ago
|
|
I'm sorry but this is not good enough. You should try to do better than "what Youtube does". Delete upon owner request (a la DMCA) is a legal maneuver. You should be able to parse out if an image is licensed as Creative Commons or public domain and show only those pictures. Else assume all rights reserved. Not to pick on your project but it's time that people try to do better than take the easiest path of show all images (without attribution) because it was the most convenient thing to do. (If you are going to do the delete on owner request thing, at least consider providing an immediate link to delete without 1) have to mail a paper request in, 2) having to sign in or 3) some other onerous route to delete) |
|
I really disagree with the approach of blowing apart a fun project and insisting bloat like a text parsing engine be added to make you happy.
http://keyword.jpg.to/source or http://keyword.jpg.to/s would do just fine IMO.